Compare

SuperTokens vs WorkOS

WorkOS scores higher on the AgentReady, 61/100 against 54/100. They differ on 8 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

SuperTokens. Open source user authentication platform that helps developers build fast, maintain control, and reduce costs.

WorkOS. WorkOS is a set of building blocks for quickly adding enterprise features to your app, providing a single, elegant interface that abstracts dozens of enterprise integrations.

Where SuperTokens is ahead

SuperTokens passes clear product positioning, and WorkOS does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: pricing understandable. WorkOS misses it.

And on adopt, free trial or free allowance. WorkOS misses it.

Where WorkOS is ahead

WorkOS passes self-service signup, agent-compatible signup flow and fast time to first request, and SuperTokens does not. That is adopt, whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop.

It also holds operate: structured, predictable output and observable execution. SuperTokens misses those.

What neither does

Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented, programmatic credential creation, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. SuperTokens leads 100 to 87. SuperTokens misses nothing; WorkOS misses clear product positioning.

Understand. SuperTokens leads 31 to 23. SuperTokens misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; WorkOS misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt. WorkOS leads 85 to 60. SuperTokens misses self-service signup, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request; WorkOS misses programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance.

Operate is whether an agent can run against it in production and recover when a call fails. WorkOS leads 50 to 24. SuperTokens misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified; WorkOS misses machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

SuperTokens starts at $0.02/MAU and has a free tier. WorkOS does not publish one.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

WorkOS clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: SuperTokens and WorkOS. Alternatives to each: SuperTokens, WorkOS.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["supertokens", "workos"]}