Compare

Speakeasy vs SuperTokens

Speakeasy scores higher on the AgentReady, 64/100 against 54/100. They differ on 8 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Speakeasy. Speakeasy is an AI control plane platform for securely scaling enterprise AI.

SuperTokens. Open source user authentication platform that helps developers build fast, maintain control, and reduce costs.

Where Speakeasy is ahead

Speakeasy passes structured api reference, and SuperTokens does not. That is understand, whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it.

It also holds adopt: agent-compatible signup flow. SuperTokens misses it.

And on operate, structured, predictable output, observable execution and agent compatibility verified. SuperTokens misses those.

Where SuperTokens is ahead

SuperTokens passes search discoverable, and Speakeasy does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds adopt: no mandatory sales call and cli available. Speakeasy misses those.

What neither does

Both fail openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented, self-service signup, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. SuperTokens leads 100 to 87. Speakeasy misses search discoverable; SuperTokens misses nothing.

Understand. Speakeasy leads 46 to 31. Speakeasy misses openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; SuperTokens misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt. SuperTokens leads 60 to 55. Speakeasy misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, cli available; SuperTokens misses self-service signup, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request.

Operate is whether an agent can run against it in production and recover when a call fails. Speakeasy leads 67 to 24. Speakeasy misses machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable; SuperTokens misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Speakeasy does not publish a machine-readable starting price with no free tier. SuperTokens starts at $0.02/MAU and has a free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Speakeasy clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Speakeasy and SuperTokens. Alternatives to each: Speakeasy, SuperTokens.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["speakeasy", "supertokens"]}