Ollama vs Sst
Ollama scores higher on the AgentReady, 59/100 against 44/100. They differ on 8 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.
What each one is
Ollama. Ollama lets you use open models with your coding agents so you can spend less while keeping your data private.
Sst. SST is a framework that makes it easy to build modern full-stack applications on your own infrastructure.
Where Ollama is ahead
Ollama passes clear product positioning, and Sst does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.
It also holds understand: pricing understandable. Sst misses it.
And on adopt, self-service signup, free trial or free allowance, fast time to first request and copyable quickstart. Sst misses those.
Finally, on operate, agent compatibility verified. Sst misses it.
Where Sst is ahead
Sst passes clear canonical domain, and Ollama does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.
What neither does
Both fail mcp discoverable, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, mcp integration available, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.
Score, pillar by pillar
The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.
Discover. Ollama leads 80 to 73. Ollama misses clear canonical domain, mcp discoverable; Sst misses clear product positioning, mcp discoverable.
Understand. Ollama leads 38 to 31. Ollama misses openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; Sst misses openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.
Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. Ollama leads 65 to 38. Ollama misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, mcp integration available; Sst misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, mcp integration available.
Operate. Ollama leads 53 to 35. Ollama misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable; Sst misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.
Pricing
Ollama starts at $0/mo and has a free tier. Sst does not publish one.
| Ollama plans | Sst plans |
|---|---|
| Free $0 | - |
| Pro $20/mo or $200/yr ($16.67/mo billed annually) | - |
| Max $100/mo | - |
| Team $500/mo | - |
| Enterprise Custom | - |
Signal by signal
| Signal | Ollama | Sst |
|---|---|---|
| AgentReady | 59 | 44 |
| Discovery | 80 | 73 |
| Understanding | 38 | 31 |
| Adoption | 65 | 38 |
| Operability | 53 | 35 |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| OpenAPI spec | Yes | Yes |
| CLI | Yes | Yes |
| llms.txt | Yes | Yes |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | Unknown |
Which to pick
Ollama clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Ollama and Sst. Alternatives to each: Ollama, Sst.
An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["ollama", "sst"]}