Compare

Moz vs Screaming Frog

Moz scores higher on the AgentReady, 49/100 against 37/100. They differ on 9 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Moz. Moz is an SEO and digital marketing solutions company providing tools for keyword research, competitive research, link research, rank tracking, and AI search visibility.

Screaming Frog. UK based SEO agency and creators of website crawler and log file analyser tools

Where Moz is ahead

Moz passes mcp discoverable, and Screaming Frog does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: authentication documented and limits / constraints documented. Screaming Frog misses those.

And on adopt, self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, fast time to first request and mcp integration available. Screaming Frog misses those.

Where Screaming Frog is ahead

Screaming Frog passes search discoverable, and Moz does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds adopt: agent-compatible signup flow. Moz misses it.

What neither does

Both fail public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs, structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, programmatic credential creation, cli available, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Both sit at 60/100 here. Moz misses search discoverable, public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs; Screaming Frog misses public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs, mcp discoverable.

Understand. Moz leads 38 to 23. Moz misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented; Screaming Frog misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. Moz leads 75 to 40. Moz misses agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, cli available; Screaming Frog misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, cli available, mcp integration available.

Operate. Both sit at 24/100 here. Moz misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified; Screaming Frog misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Moz starts at $20 and has a free tier. Screaming Frog does not publish one and has a free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Moz clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Moz and Screaming Frog. Alternatives to each: Moz, Screaming Frog.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["moz", "screamingfrog"]}