New: the hosted MCP server is live. Connect your agent in one command.Read the docs →
StackResolve logoStackResolve

Compare

Mcp vs Permit.io

Permit.io scores higher on the AgentReady, 79/100 against 58/100. They differ on 14 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Mcp. MCP.so is a discovery platform for MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, connecting AI apps to tools, data, and automated workflows.

Permit.io. Permissions for the AI era.

Where Mcp is ahead

Mcp passes self-service signup, and Permit.io does not. That is adopt, whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop.

It also holds operate: retry behavior documented and agent compatibility verified. Permit.io misses those.

Where Permit.io is ahead

Permit.io passes public docs discoverable, and Mcp does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided and errors and status codes documented. Mcp misses those.

And on adopt, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation and copyable quickstart. Mcp misses those.

Finally, on operate, structured, predictable output and machine-readable errors. Mcp misses those.

What neither does

Both fail authentication documented, limits / constraints documented, no mandatory sales call, fast time to first request, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Permit.io leads 100 to 87. Mcp misses public docs discoverable; Permit.io misses nothing.

Understand is whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it. Permit.io leads 85 to 23. Mcp misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; Permit.io misses authentication documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt. Permit.io leads 70 to 60. Mcp misses no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart; Permit.io misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, fast time to first request.

Operate. Mcp leads 61 to 59. Mcp misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable; Permit.io misses retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Mcp starts at $399/mo with no free tier. Permit.io does not publish one and has a free tier.

Mcp plansPermit.io plans
Platinum Sponsor $1,299/moCommunity Free Forever
Gold Sponsor $699/moEnterprise Custom
Silver Sponsor $399/mo-

Signal by signal

SignalMcpPermit.io
AgentReady5879
Discovery87100
Understanding2385
Adoption6070
Operability6159
Public APIYesYes
MCP serverYesYes
OpenAPI specUnknownYes
CLIYesYes
llms.txtYesYes
Self-serve signupYesNo
Free tierNoYes

Which to pick

Permit.io clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Mcp and Permit.io. Alternatives to each: Mcp, Permit.io.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["mcp", "permit"]}