Compare

Logto vs Speakeasy

Speakeasy scores higher on the AgentReady, 64/100 against 58/100. They differ on 8 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Logto. Logto is an open-source authentication and identity platform built for developers, offering auth, SSO, and RBAC for SaaS, AI agents, and B2B apps.

Speakeasy. Speakeasy is an AI control plane platform for securely scaling enterprise AI.

Where Logto is ahead

Logto passes search discoverable, and Speakeasy does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: limits / constraints documented. Speakeasy misses it.

And on adopt, self-service signup. Speakeasy misses it.

Where Speakeasy is ahead

Speakeasy passes mcp discoverable, and Logto does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds adopt: copyable quickstart and mcp integration available. Logto misses those.

And on operate, structured, predictable output and agent compatibility verified. Logto misses those.

What neither does

Both fail openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, cli available, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Both sit at 87/100 here. Logto misses mcp discoverable; Speakeasy misses search discoverable.

Understand. Logto leads 54 to 46. Logto misses openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented; Speakeasy misses openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt. Speakeasy leads 55 to 50. Logto misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, cli available, mcp integration available; Speakeasy misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, cli available.

Operate is whether an agent can run against it in production and recover when a call fails. Speakeasy leads 67 to 39. Logto misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified; Speakeasy misses machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable.

Pricing

Logto starts at $0/mo and has a free tier. Speakeasy does not publish one with no free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Speakeasy clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Logto and Speakeasy. Alternatives to each: Logto, Speakeasy.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["logto", "speakeasy"]}