Compare

Koyeb vs SuperTokens

Koyeb scores higher on the AgentReady, 57/100 against 54/100. They differ on 8 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Koyeb. Developer-friendly serverless platform designed to let businesses and developers easily deploy reliable and scalable applications globally, with high-performance infrastructure for AI inference, sandboxes, and microservices on CPUs, GPUs, and accelerators

SuperTokens. Open source user authentication platform that helps developers build fast, maintain control, and reduce costs.

Where Koyeb is ahead

Koyeb passes self-service signup, agent-compatible signup flow and fast time to first request, and SuperTokens does not. That is adopt, whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop.

It also holds operate: observable execution. SuperTokens misses it.

Where SuperTokens is ahead

SuperTokens passes clear canonical domain, llms.txt published and llms-full.txt / full agent docs, and Koyeb does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: authentication documented. Koyeb misses it.

What neither does

Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented, programmatic credential creation, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. SuperTokens leads 100 to 80. Koyeb misses clear canonical domain, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs; SuperTokens misses nothing.

Understand. SuperTokens leads 31 to 23. Koyeb misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; SuperTokens misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. Koyeb leads 90 to 60. Koyeb misses programmatic credential creation; SuperTokens misses self-service signup, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request.

Operate. Koyeb leads 35 to 24. Koyeb misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified; SuperTokens misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Koyeb does not publish a machine-readable starting price and has a free tier. SuperTokens starts at $0.02/MAU and has a free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Signal counts are level here, so fit and price decide it. Full profiles: Koyeb and SuperTokens. Alternatives to each: Koyeb, SuperTokens.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["koyeb", "supertokens"]}