Hasdata vs Serper
Hasdata scores higher on the AgentReady, 58/100 against 56/100. They differ on 14 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.
What each one is
Hasdata. HasData is a cloud-based web scraping API that simplifies web-scraping tasks for businesses of all sizes.
Serper. Serper is a Google Search API service that provides lightning-fast Google search results in 1-2 seconds at an unbeatable price.
Where Hasdata is ahead
Hasdata passes clear canonical domain, public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs and machine-readable metadata, and Serper does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.
It also holds understand: limits / constraints documented. Serper misses it.
And on adopt, no mandatory sales call, official python sdk and cli available. Serper misses those.
Where Serper is ahead
Serper passes clear product positioning, and Hasdata does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.
It also holds understand: authentication documented. Hasdata misses it.
And on operate, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution and agent compatibility verified. Hasdata misses those.
What neither does
Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.
Score, pillar by pillar
The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.
Discover. Hasdata leads 87 to 60. Hasdata misses clear product positioning; Serper misses clear canonical domain, public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs, machine-readable metadata.
Understand. Both sit at 31/100 here. Hasdata misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented; Serper misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.
Adopt. Hasdata leads 80 to 55. Hasdata misses programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart; Serper misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, official python sdk, cli available.
Operate is whether an agent can run against it in production and recover when a call fails. Serper leads 76 to 35. Hasdata misses machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified; Serper misses machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support.
Pricing
Hasdata starts at $0/mo and has a free tier. Serper does not publish one and has a free tier.
| Hasdata plans | Serper plans |
|---|---|
| Free $0/mo | - |
| Startup $49/mo | - |
| Basic $99/mo | - |
| Growth $208/mo | - |
Signal by signal
| Signal | Hasdata | Serper |
|---|---|---|
| AgentReady | 58 | 56 |
| Discovery | 87 | 60 |
| Understanding | 31 | 31 |
| Adoption | 80 | 55 |
| Operability | 35 | 76 |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| OpenAPI spec | Unknown | Unknown |
| CLI | Yes | No |
| llms.txt | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
Which to pick
Hasdata clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Hasdata and Serper. Alternatives to each: Hasdata, Serper.
An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["hasdata", "serper"]}