Compare

Hasdata vs Screaming Frog

Hasdata scores higher on the AgentReady, 58/100 against 37/100. They differ on 12 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Hasdata. HasData is a cloud-based web scraping API that simplifies web-scraping tasks for businesses of all sizes.

Screaming Frog. UK based SEO agency and creators of website crawler and log file analyser tools

Where Hasdata is ahead

Hasdata passes public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs and mcp discoverable, and Screaming Frog does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: limits / constraints documented. Screaming Frog misses it.

And on adopt, self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, cli available and mcp integration available. Screaming Frog misses those.

Finally, on operate, structured, predictable output. Screaming Frog misses it.

Where Screaming Frog is ahead

Screaming Frog passes clear product positioning, and Hasdata does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds adopt: copyable quickstart. Hasdata misses it.

What neither does

Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Hasdata leads 87 to 60. Hasdata misses clear product positioning; Screaming Frog misses public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs, mcp discoverable.

Understand. Hasdata leads 31 to 23. Hasdata misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented; Screaming Frog misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. Hasdata leads 80 to 40. Hasdata misses programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart; Screaming Frog misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, cli available, mcp integration available.

Operate. Hasdata leads 35 to 24. Hasdata misses machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified; Screaming Frog misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Hasdata starts at $0/mo and has a free tier. Screaming Frog does not publish one and has a free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Hasdata clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Hasdata and Screaming Frog. Alternatives to each: Hasdata, Screaming Frog.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["hasdata", "screamingfrog"]}