Compare

Gogs vs Koyeb

Koyeb scores higher on the AgentReady, 57/100 against 53/100. They differ on 11 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Gogs. A simple, stable and extensible self-hosted Git service that can be set up in the most painless way

Koyeb. Developer-friendly serverless platform designed to let businesses and developers easily deploy reliable and scalable applications globally, with high-performance infrastructure for AI inference, sandboxes, and microservices on CPUs, GPUs, and accelerators

Where Gogs is ahead

Gogs passes clear canonical domain, llms.txt published and llms-full.txt / full agent docs, and Koyeb does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: limits / constraints documented. Koyeb misses it.

And on operate, agent compatibility verified. Koyeb misses it.

Where Koyeb is ahead

Koyeb passes public docs discoverable, and Gogs does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds adopt: self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, fast time to first request and official python sdk. Gogs misses those.

What neither does

Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, programmatic credential creation, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Gogs leads 87 to 80. Gogs misses public docs discoverable; Koyeb misses clear canonical domain, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs.

Understand. Gogs leads 31 to 23. Gogs misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented; Koyeb misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. Koyeb leads 90 to 40. Gogs misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, official python sdk; Koyeb misses programmatic credential creation.

Operate. Gogs leads 53 to 35. Gogs misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable; Koyeb misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Gogs does not publish a machine-readable starting price and has a free tier. Koyeb does not publish one and has a free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Koyeb clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Gogs and Koyeb. Alternatives to each: Gogs, Koyeb.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["gogs", "koyeb"]}