Compare

Gcore vs KeyCDN

KeyCDN scores higher on the AgentReady, 45/100 against 43/100. They differ on 13 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Gcore. Gcore is a cloud infrastructure and edge services provider offering CDN, cloud computing, AI infrastructure, streaming, DDoS protection, and security solutions.

KeyCDN. KeyCDN is a high performance content delivery network built for the future, enabling users to deliver content to users at blazing fast speed with setup in minutes.

Where Gcore is ahead

Gcore passes clear canonical domain, public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs and machine-readable metadata, and KeyCDN does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: structured api reference. KeyCDN misses it.

Where KeyCDN is ahead

KeyCDN passes authentication documented, pricing understandable and limits / constraints documented, and Gcore does not. That is understand, whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it.

It also holds adopt: self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow and free trial or free allowance. Gcore misses those.

What neither does

Both fail mcp discoverable, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, cli available, mcp integration available, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover is whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists. Gcore leads 87 to 47. Gcore misses mcp discoverable; KeyCDN misses clear canonical domain, public docs discoverable, llms.txt published, llms-full.txt / full agent docs, mcp discoverable, machine-readable metadata.

Understand. KeyCDN leads 38 to 31. Gcore misses openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; KeyCDN misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented.

Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. KeyCDN leads 60 to 20. Gcore misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, cli available, mcp integration available; KeyCDN misses programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, cli available, mcp integration available.

Operate. Both sit at 35/100 here. Gcore misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified; KeyCDN misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Gcore does not publish a machine-readable starting price. KeyCDN starts at $4/mo with no free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

KeyCDN clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Gcore and KeyCDN. Alternatives to each: Gcore, KeyCDN.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["gcore", "keycdn"]}