Fingerprint vs Wiz
Fingerprint scores higher on the AgentReady, 63/100 against 45/100. They differ on 9 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.
What each one is
Fingerprint. Fingerprint helps teams prevent fraud, improve user experiences, and better understand their traffic.
Wiz. Wiz connects code, cloud, and runtime into a single security graph that provides the end-to-end context required to automate risk reduction and threat response, enabling security teams to operate at AI speed.
Where Fingerprint is ahead
Fingerprint passes public docs discoverable and llms-full.txt / full agent docs, and Wiz does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.
It also holds understand: authentication documented and limits / constraints documented. Wiz misses those.
And on adopt, self-service signup, agent-compatible signup flow, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart and cli available. Wiz misses those.
What neither does
Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.
Score, pillar by pillar
The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.
Discover. Fingerprint leads 100 to 80. Fingerprint misses nothing; Wiz misses public docs discoverable, llms-full.txt / full agent docs.
Understand. Fingerprint leads 38 to 23. Fingerprint misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented; Wiz misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.
Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. Fingerprint leads 80 to 40. Fingerprint misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation; Wiz misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, cli available.
Operate. Both sit at 35/100 here. Fingerprint misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified; Wiz misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.
Pricing
Fingerprint starts at $99/mo and has a free tier. Wiz does not publish one with no free tier.
| Fingerprint plans | Wiz plans |
|---|---|
| Free $0/month | Wiz Cloud Custom |
| Pro Plus $99/month for 20K API calls then $4 per 1,000 additional API calls | Wiz Code Custom |
| Enterprise Custom | Wiz Defend Custom |
| - | Wiz Sensor Custom |
| - | Wiz Go Bundle for SMBs Custom |
Signal by signal
| Signal | Fingerprint | Wiz |
|---|---|---|
| AgentReady | 63 | 45 |
| Discovery | 100 | 80 |
| Understanding | 38 | 23 |
| Adoption | 80 | 40 |
| Operability | 35 | 35 |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| OpenAPI spec | Unknown | Unknown |
| CLI | Yes | Unknown |
| llms.txt | Yes | Yes |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | No |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
Which to pick
Fingerprint clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Fingerprint and Wiz. Alternatives to each: Fingerprint, Wiz.
An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["fingerprint", "wiz"]}