Compare

Descope vs Permit.io

Permit.io scores higher on the AgentReady, 79/100 against 61/100. They differ on 14 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Descope. Descope is a passwordless authentication and user management service designed for developers.

Permit.io. Permissions for the AI era.

Where Descope is ahead

Descope passes authentication documented, and Permit.io does not. That is understand, whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it.

It also holds adopt: self-service signup, no mandatory sales call and fast time to first request. Permit.io misses those.

Where Permit.io is ahead

Permit.io passes structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided and errors and status codes documented, and Descope does not. That is understand, whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it.

It also holds adopt: programmatic credential creation and free trial or free allowance. Descope misses those.

And on operate, structured, predictable output and machine-readable errors. Descope misses those.

What neither does

Both fail limits / constraints documented, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Understand is whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it. Permit.io leads 85 to 23. Descope misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; Permit.io misses authentication documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt. Descope leads 85 to 70. Descope misses programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance; Permit.io misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, fast time to first request.

Operate. Permit.io leads 59 to 35. Descope misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified; Permit.io misses retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Descope does not publish a machine-readable starting price. Permit.io does not publish one and has a free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Permit.io clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Descope and Permit.io. Alternatives to each: Descope, Permit.io.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["descope", "permit"]}