New: the hosted MCP server is live. Connect your agent in one command.Read the docs →
StackResolve logoStackResolve

Compare

Crawlbase vs Zenrows

Crawlbase scores higher on the AgentReady, 68/100 against 62/100. They differ on 3 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Crawlbase. Crawlbase provides web crawling, scraping, and parsing APIs at scale.

Zenrows. Web data infrastructure for AI agents, data, and automation teams.

Where Crawlbase is ahead

Crawlbase passes search discoverable, and Zenrows does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds adopt: fast time to first request and copyable quickstart. Zenrows misses those.

What neither does

Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover is whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists. Crawlbase leads 100 to 87. Crawlbase misses nothing; Zenrows misses search discoverable.

Understand. Both sit at 38/100 here. Crawlbase misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented; Zenrows misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented.

Adopt. Crawlbase leads 81 to 70. Crawlbase misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation; Zenrows misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart.

Operate. Both sit at 53/100 here. Crawlbase misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable; Zenrows misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable.

Pricing

Crawlbase does not publish a machine-readable starting price and has a free tier. Zenrows does not publish one and has a free tier.

Signal by signal

SignalCrawlbaseZenrows
AgentReady6862
Discovery10087
Understanding3838
Adoption8170
Operability5353
Public APIYesYes
MCP serverYesYes
OpenAPI specUnknownUnknown
CLIYesYes
llms.txtYesYes
Self-serve signupYesYes
Free tierYesYes

Which to pick

Crawlbase clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Crawlbase and Zenrows. Alternatives to each: Crawlbase, Zenrows.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["crawlbase", "zenrows"]}