Convex vs Singlestore
Convex scores higher on the AgentReady, 61/100 against 57/100. They differ on 7 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.
What each one is
Convex. The reactive backend platform that keeps up with you and your agents.
Singlestore. SingleStore is a distributed SQL database built to power intelligent applications.
Where Convex is ahead
Convex passes pricing understandable, and Singlestore does not. That is understand, whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it.
It also holds adopt: no mandatory sales call and free trial or free allowance. Singlestore misses those.
And on operate, retry behavior documented and agent compatibility verified. Singlestore misses those.
Where Singlestore is ahead
Singlestore passes mcp discoverable, and Convex does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.
It also holds adopt: mcp integration available. Convex misses it.
What neither does
Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented, programmatic credential creation, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.
Score, pillar by pillar
The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.
Discover. Singlestore leads 100 to 87. Convex misses mcp discoverable; Singlestore misses nothing.
Understand. Convex leads 23 to 15. Convex misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; Singlestore misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.
Adopt. Convex leads 76 to 75. Convex misses programmatic credential creation, mcp integration available; Singlestore misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance.
Operate is whether an agent can run against it in production and recover when a call fails. Convex leads 59 to 39. Convex misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable; Singlestore misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.
Pricing
Convex starts at $0/mo and has a free tier. Singlestore does not publish one.
| Convex plans | Singlestore plans |
|---|---|
| Free $0/month and pay as you go | - |
| Professional $25 per developer/month | - |
Signal by signal
| Signal | Convex | Singlestore |
|---|---|---|
| AgentReady | 61 | 57 |
| Discovery | 87 | 100 |
| Understanding | 23 | 15 |
| Adoption | 76 | 75 |
| Operability | 59 | 39 |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | Yes |
| OpenAPI spec | Unknown | Unknown |
| CLI | Yes | Yes |
| llms.txt | Yes | Yes |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes | Unknown |
Which to pick
Convex clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Convex and Singlestore. Alternatives to each: Convex, Singlestore.
An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["convex", "singlestore"]}