Compare

Cerbos vs WorkOS

WorkOS scores higher on the AgentReady, 61/100 against 46/100. They differ on 9 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Cerbos. Authorization management platform for applications, APIs, AI agents, MCP servers, services, and workloads.

WorkOS. WorkOS is a set of building blocks for quickly adding enterprise features to your app, providing a single, elegant interface that abstracts dozens of enterprise integrations.

Where Cerbos is ahead

Cerbos passes clear product positioning, and WorkOS does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

Where WorkOS is ahead

WorkOS passes clear canonical domain, and Cerbos does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: authentication documented. Cerbos misses it.

And on adopt, self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, fast time to first request and cli available. Cerbos misses those.

Finally, on operate, structured, predictable output. Cerbos misses it.

What neither does

Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Cerbos leads 93 to 87. Cerbos misses clear canonical domain; WorkOS misses clear product positioning.

Understand. WorkOS leads 23 to 15. Cerbos misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; WorkOS misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. WorkOS leads 85 to 40. Cerbos misses self-service signup, no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance, fast time to first request, cli available; WorkOS misses programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance.

Operate. WorkOS leads 50 to 35. Cerbos misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified; WorkOS misses machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Cerbos does not publish a machine-readable starting price. WorkOS does not publish one.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

WorkOS clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Cerbos and WorkOS. Alternatives to each: Cerbos, WorkOS.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["cerbos", "workos"]}