Compare

Bunny vs Fastly

Fastly scores higher on the AgentReady, 60/100 against 45/100. They differ on 10 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Bunny. The global edge platform that truly hops.

Fastly. Fastly is an edge cloud platform company that helps businesses build, secure, and deliver fast, scalable sites and apps.

Where Bunny is ahead

Bunny passes clear product positioning and llms-full.txt / full agent docs, and Fastly does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

Where Fastly is ahead

Fastly passes clear canonical domain and mcp discoverable, and Bunny does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: structured api reference, pricing understandable and limits / constraints documented. Bunny misses those.

And on adopt, agent-compatible signup flow, free trial or free allowance and mcp integration available. Bunny misses those.

What neither does

Both fail openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Both sit at 80/100 here. Bunny misses clear canonical domain, mcp discoverable; Fastly misses clear product positioning, llms-full.txt / full agent docs.

Understand is whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it. Fastly leads 46 to 15. Bunny misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; Fastly misses openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented.

Adopt. Fastly leads 80 to 50. Bunny misses no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance, mcp integration available; Fastly misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation.

Operate. Both sit at 35/100 here. Bunny misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified; Fastly misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Bunny does not publish a machine-readable starting price. Fastly does not publish one and has a free tier.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Fastly clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Bunny and Fastly. Alternatives to each: Bunny, Fastly.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["bunny", "fastly"]}