New: the hosted MCP server is live. Connect your agent in one command.Read the docs →
StackResolve logoStackResolve

Compare

Axiom vs New Relic

Axiom scores higher on the AgentReady, 60/100 against 51/100. They differ on 6 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Axiom. The modern machine data platform.

New Relic. Intelligent Observability platform that resolves issues at scale before they impact bottom line

Where Axiom is ahead

Axiom passes llms-full.txt / full agent docs and mcp discoverable, and New Relic does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: authentication documented and limits / constraints documented. New Relic misses those.

And on adopt, mcp integration available. New Relic misses it.

Where New Relic is ahead

New Relic passes search discoverable, and Axiom does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

What neither does

Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Axiom leads 87 to 80. Axiom misses search discoverable; New Relic misses llms-full.txt / full agent docs, mcp discoverable.

Understand. Axiom leads 38 to 23. Axiom misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented; New Relic misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. Axiom leads 81 to 65. Axiom misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation; New Relic misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, mcp integration available.

Operate. Both sit at 35/100 here. Axiom misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified; New Relic misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, agent compatibility verified.

Pricing

Axiom starts at $0/mo and has a free tier. New Relic does not publish one and has a free tier.

Axiom plansNew Relic plans
Personal $0/month-
Axiom Cloud $25/month-
SSO (SAML) $100/month-
RBAC $50/month-
Audit Log $50/month-
Directory Sync $100/month-

Signal by signal

SignalAxiomNew Relic
AgentReady6051
Discovery8780
Understanding3823
Adoption8165
Operability3535
Public APIYesYes
MCP serverYesUnknown
OpenAPI specUnknownUnknown
CLIYesYes
llms.txtYesYes
Self-serve signupYesYes
Free tierYesYes

Which to pick

Axiom clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Axiom and New Relic. Alternatives to each: Axiom, New Relic.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["axiom", "newrelic"]}