Compare

Arcade vs Ory

Arcade scores higher on the AgentReady, 61/100 against 55/100. They differ on 7 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.

What each one is

Arcade. The runtime between your agents and every system they need to reach.

Ory. Ory provides secure, friction-free identity and access management for customers, partners, machines, and agents - with seamless access, granular permissions, and real-time protection.

Where Arcade is ahead

Arcade passes llms-full.txt / full agent docs, and Ory does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds understand: authentication documented. Ory misses it.

And on adopt, self-service signup, agent-compatible signup flow and fast time to first request. Ory misses those.

Where Ory is ahead

Ory passes clear product positioning, and Arcade does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.

It also holds adopt: no mandatory sales call. Arcade misses it.

What neither does

Both fail structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.

Score, pillar by pillar

The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.

Discover. Ory leads 93 to 87. Arcade misses clear product positioning; Ory misses llms-full.txt / full agent docs.

Understand. Arcade leads 23 to 15. Arcade misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented; Ory misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, authentication documented, pricing understandable, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.

Adopt is whether an agent can get a key and make its first successful call without a human in the loop. Arcade leads 76 to 57. Arcade misses no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance; Ory misses self-service signup, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, free trial or free allowance, fast time to first request.

Operate. Arcade leads 56 to 53. Arcade misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable; Ory misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable.

Pricing

Arcade does not publish a machine-readable starting price. Ory does not publish one.

Signal by signal

Which to pick

Arcade clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Arcade and Ory. Alternatives to each: Arcade, Ory.

An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["arcade", "ory"]}